La tutela della dignità umana: fondamento e scopo della Convenzione di Oviedo. In: Furlan, E. Bioetica e dignità umana: Interpretazioni a. PDF on ResearchGate | On May 1, , R Andorno and others published La tutela della dignità umana: fondamento e scopo della Convenzione di Oviedo. Venti anni dopo la Convenzione di Oviedo / Equitable access, appropriate quality . Twenty years after the Oviedo Convention | Il diritto alla tutela della salute.
|Genre:||Health and Food|
|Published (Last):||7 March 2006|
|PDF File Size:||11.25 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.80 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The only restrictions are those prescribed by law and which are necessary in a democratic society in the interest of public safety, for the prevention of crime, for the protection of public health or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others. The Convention recognises the importance of promoting a public debate and consultation on these questions.
On the other hand, health care imposed by force, however conceived and carried out, evidently will assume the characteristics of a violent act particularly humiliating not just because aimed at the “body” of the patient, but above all because bound to downgrade the most deeply-rooted convictions of the interested party: Nevertheless, at the time when a practical decision is imperative the physician might look in vain for guidance in legal theory and practice, which up to now have proved capable only of providing a highly contradictory gamut of solutions: The only exception is, under certain conditions, for regenerative tissue especially bone marrow between siblings.
The Convention is the first legally-binding international text designed to preserve human dignity, rights and freedoms, through a series of principles and prohibitions against the misuse of biological and medical advances.
Firme e ratifiche Riserve et Dichiarazioni Rapporto esplicativo Protocolli.
Sign in Create an account. Weiss – – Bioessays 36 1: Genome Editing, Asilomar, and the Politics of Deliberation. The inconsistency of this ban with regard to the most widespread position in the scientific community is highlighted, and then critically examined the supporting reasons which, in the opinion of the author, are not consistent with a rational analysis of the inner structure of the Convention, in particular in relation to the issue of responsibility towards future generations.
Additional Protocols are foreseen to clarify, strengthen and supplement the overall Convention. It prohibits the creation of human embryos for research purposes and requires an adequate protection of embryos where countries allow in-vitro research.
Neri Demetrio, Crispr-Cas9, la convenzione di Oviedo e le generazioni future – PhilPapers
The Model T of Convenzipne. The author tackles the theme of the refusal on the part of a patient of a certain therapy, when such decision produces a health hazard or mortal danger. No keywords specified fix it. Traduzioni ordinati per lingue non ufficiali. The author finds a similar variety of views in doctrine.
The greater the patient’s chances of being able to return to a normal life, and the more irrational the reasons for the refusal appear to be, the more difficult it is for the physician to respect such a refusal. The Convention’s starting point is that the interests of human beings must come before the interests of science or society.
Cohvenzione – – American Journal of Bioethics 15 Added to PP index Total downloads 1 1, of 2, Recent downloads 6 months 1of 2, How can I increase my conbenzione For the most part, respect for the will of the patient will be experienced by the physician as a sort of “facilitation” of self-destructive behaviour intrinsically contradictory with respect to the original sense of the medical profession.
For the most part, in this field the law intervenes “a posteriori” to evaluate in hindsight and with an outcome that is practically unforeseeable the penal implications of the situation.
What legal theory can nevertheless be reproached for is its frequent indulgence in considerations which may be of notable cultural significance, but which risk being misleading in the context of argumentation that aspires to be perfectly juridical.
The Convention recognises also the patient’s right not to know. La Convenzione vieta ogni forma di discriminazione nei confronti di una persona in base al suo patrimonio genetico e autorizza test genetici solo a fini medici. Sign in to use this feature. On one side of the issue is the essentially dominant approach, which deduces from the clear expression contained in Art.
Find it on Scholar. La sola eccezione si ha, a certe condizioni, per il prelievo di tessuti rigenerabili tra fratelli e sorelle. Human Genome Editing and Ethical Considerations. Wade – – Bioessays 39 Cases of this type pose a dramatic dilemma. The Convention sets out rules related to medical research by including detailed and precise conditions, especially for people who cannot give their consent. Stephan Guttinger – – Science and Engineering Ethics 24 4: Scienza E Filosofia The Convention prohibits the removal of organs and other tissues which cannot be regenerated from people not able to give consent.
Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine.
Rivisteweb: Article Details
Essa permette interventi di ingegneria genetica solo per ragioni preventive, diagnostiche o terapeutiche e solo quando il suo scopo non sia di modificare il patrimonio genetico di una persona. Details of Treaty No. Convenzione sui Diritti dell’Uomo e la biomedicina.
Rodriguez – – Journal of Clinical Research and Bioethics 7 2. The Convention states the principle according to which a person has to give the necessary consent for treatment expressly, in advance, except in emergencies, and that such consent may be freely withdrawn at any time.
It bans all forms of discrimination based on the grounds of a person’s genetic make-up and allows the carrying out of predictive genetic convenzkone only for medical purposes. The treatment of persons unable to give their consent, such as children and people with mental illnesses, may be carried out only if it could produce real and direct benefit to his or her health.
History of Western Philosophy. La Convenzione riconosce anche il diritto del paziente a non essere informato. Undoubtedly, to some extent this disparity of viewpoints is only normal in reference to such a complex emotional issue. Benjamin Hurlbut – – Hastings Center Report 45 5: Treaty Office on http: Ben Merriman – – American Journal of Bioethics 15